Research Article - Social Sciences Open Access Logo

Navigating Asymmetric Threats: Japan’s Role in Enhancing Vietnam’s Maritime Capacity in the South China Sea during the Early Decades of the 21st Century

Cả Văn Phan 1, *
  1. Tp. Hồ Chí Minh
Correspondence to: Cả Văn Phan, Tp. Hồ Chí Minh. Email: [email protected].
Published: 2026-06-09

Online metrics


Statistics from the website

  • Abstract Views: 897
  • Galley Views: 478

Statistics from Dimensions

This article is published with open access by Viet Nam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0) which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. 

Abstract

In the context of growing tensions in the South China Sea–fueled by overlapping territorial claims and intensifying strategic rivalry among major powers–maritime security cooperation between Japan and Vietnam has become a critical element of their respective foreign and defense policies. This study investigates the principal strategic drivers underpinning the Japan–Vietnam maritime security collaboration in the South China Sea during the early 21st century and evaluates its implications for the evolving regional security architecture. The analysis centers on the four primary mechanisms of cooperation: (1) high-level defense dialogues; (2) technical assistance and transfer of maritime equipment; (3) joint training programs and military exercises; and (4) collaboration in non-traditional security domains, including search and rescue, anti-piracy efforts, and disaster response operations. Of particular note is Japan’s intermediary role in enhancing Vietnam’s maritime security capabilities, undertaken with due consideration to Vietnam’s defense policy framework, especially the “Four No’s” principle. The findings indicate that the Japan–Vietnam maritime security cooperation is underpinned by a strategic alignment aimed at safeguarding freedom of navigation, countering unilateral actions, and reinforcing a rules-based regional order. Despite facing constraints such as institutional limitations, geopolitical pressure from China, and divergent strategic priorities, the partnership demonstrates resilience, sustained by a stable political foundation and mutual adherence to international law. These elements foster a conducive environment for deepening future cooperation and contribute constructively to the development of a flexible, inclusive, and rules-based regional security architecture consistent with the vision of a “Free and Open Indo-Pacific”.

Comments