Research Article - Social Sciences Open Access Logo

The Current Status of Khmer-Vietnamese Bilingual Education for Khmer Primary School Students in the Mekong Delta

Duong Minh Quang 1, *
Lý Bình Nhung
  1. Ho Chi Minh City University of Social Sciences and Humanities
Correspondence to: Duong Minh Quang, Ho Chi Minh City University of Social Sciences and Humanities. Email: [email protected].
Volume & Issue: Vol. 10 No. 3 (2026) | Page No.: 3917-3925 | DOI: 10.32508/vnuhcmjssh.v10i3.1184
Published: 2026-09-24

Online metrics


Statistics from the website

  • Abstract Views: 1703
  • Galley Views: 890

Statistics from Dimensions

This article is published with open access by Viet Nam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0) which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. 

Abstract

Vietnam is a country characterized by the profound linguistic and ethnic diversity, providing a favorable foundation for the implementation of bilingual education models aligned with international trends that promote equity, integration, and sustainable educational development. In this context, the study examines the current status of Khmer–Vietnamese bilingual education for Khmer primary school students across three provinces in the Mekong Delta region. A mixed-methods research design was employed, combining the survey data from 139 teachers directly involved in bilingual instruction with in-depth interviews conducted with three experienced teachers to enrich the qualitative understanding of implementation practices. The analysis reveals that all key components of bilingual education achieved an average score of approximately 4.0 on a five-point Likert scale, indicating a high level of agreement and generally positive evaluations from the teaching workforce. Specifically, the goals and content of the program were rated at the “agree” level, reflecting the considerable consensus regarding the orientation and pedagogical significance of bilingual education for Khmer students. Meanwhile, the instructional methods and assessment practices were reported at the “frequent” level, suggesting that teachers consistently employ teaching and evaluation activities aligned with the requirements of the bilingual model. Based on these findings, the study proposes several recommendations to enhance the effectiveness of program implementation. These include strengthening teacher professional development, developing culturally and linguistically responsive learning materials, fostering stronger collaboration among schools, families, and communities, and establishing continuous monitoring and support mechanisms to ensure the long-term sustainability of Khmer–Vietnamese bilingual education at the local level.

Comments