Research Article - Arts & Humanities Open Access Logo

The Relations between the Funan Kingdom and the Oriental Countries (the Case of India and China)

Le Thi Sinh Hien 1, *
  1. University of Social Sciences and Humanities, VNUHCM, Vietnam
Correspondence to: Le Thi Sinh Hien, University of Social Sciences and Humanities, VNUHCM, Vietnam. Email: [email protected].
Volume & Issue: Vol. 10 No. 2 (2026) | Page No.: 3577-3588 | DOI: 10.32508/vnuhcmjssh.v10i2.1186
Published: 2026-05-26

Online metrics


Statistics from the website

  • Abstract Views: 822
  • Galley Views: 423

Statistics from Dimensions

This article is published with open access by Viet Nam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0) which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. 

Abstract

Funan was an ancient kingdom in the Indochinese Peninsula, formed and developed from the 1st to the 7th century CE and lasted until the 12th century. Funan was situated on the East-West maritime trade route with the bustling port of Oc Eo, one of the most important of its time. The characteristics of Funan reflected Indian cultural and religious elements, especially sculpture, architecture, Buddhist, and Hindu thoughts. Funan is known as the first Indianized state in Southeast Asia. However, ancient Chinese texts from the Southern Qi Dynasty, Liang Dynasty, Jin Dynasty, to the New Tang Dynasty all show the relationship between Funan and the Chinese dynasties. Notably, the peak development period of Funan, reflected in the Oc Eo culture during the 4th-6th centuries, when referenced to India, marks the golden age of the Gupta Dynasty (320-550 CE). According to Chinese records, by 550, the Gupta Dynasty declined, around the same time that Funan was annexed by Chenla. Was this a coincidence, or was there a close relationship between Gupta and Funan? This article relies on archaeological and linguistic sources to point out the relationship between Funan and India (during the Gupta period) and explains why Funan chose the Indian state model, while with China, Funan only maintained diplomatic and trade relations.

 

Comments